{"product_id":"9788412282788","title":"The devilish proof in criminal law","description":"\u003ch2\u003eThe Diabolical Proof in Criminal Law\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eBook Summary\u003c\/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis work offers a rigorous and critical analysis of the presumption of innocence and its practical application in criminal proceedings. The author examines how the proof of negative facts, known as the \"diabolical proof,\" manifests in areas such as pretrial detention, questioning the logic of judicial inference processes. An essential study for understanding the tensions between constitutional guarantees and the legal presumptions that operate within procedural strategy.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eWhat is it about?\u003c\/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe book addresses the presumption of innocence not as a simple popular maxim, but as a complex rule of procedural treatment. It focuses on the so-called diabolical proof—that which rests on negative facts—and analyzes its role in the determination of pretrial detention. The author breaks down the processes of inferring signs of criminality used by judges, pointing out how they often defer to law and jurisprudence rather than evaluating the specific facts of the case. According to the book's thesis, this strips the parties of their capacity for challenge and effective control, transforming the presumption of innocence into a formal rather than material guarantee.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eMain Topics\u003c\/h3\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003ePresumption of innocence as a rule of procedural treatment in investigation and oral trial.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eDiabolical proof or proof of negative facts and its relationship with the burden of proof.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003ePretrial detention and the battle of presumptions between innocence and guilt.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eProcesses of judicial inference and the justification of resolutions regarding precautionary measures.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eCritique of the lack of factual reasoning in judicial decisions regarding signs of criminality.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eWho is it recommended for?\u003c\/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIt is aimed at legal professionals, especially criminal and constitutional lawyers, as well as judges, prosecutors, and academics interested in the theory of criminal procedure and the guarantee of the presumption of innocence. It is also useful for advanced law students seeking to delve deeper into evidentiary logic and procedural strategy.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eWhat this book provides\u003c\/h3\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eA critical and detailed analysis of the practical application of the presumption of innocence in pretrial detention.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eClarification of the concept of diabolical proof and its relevance in criminal judicial reasoning.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eTools to identify and question the lack of factual justification in judicial resolutions.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eA perspective that links evidentiary logic with defense and prosecution strategy.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eFoundations for a more robust challenge of decisions based on inferences regarding future events.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eTechnical Specifications\u003c\/h3\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eAuthor: Pascual Cadena, Antoni\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003ePublisher: J.M. BOSCH EDITOR\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eLanguage: Spanish\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eSubject: Procedural Law, Constitutional and Administrative Law, Criminal Law and Procedure\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eCollection: FONDO\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eBinding: Paperback\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003ePublication date: January 2021\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eNumber of pages: 238\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\u003cli\u003eWeight: 480 g\u003c\/li\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eEditorial Review\u003c\/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis is a specialized work that deeply addresses a central issue of contemporary criminal proceedings: the tension between the presumption of innocence and precautionary measures. The author offers a well-founded critique of judicial practice, providing a useful theoretical framework for professionals seeking to strengthen their arguments in court. Its focus on the logic of proof and judicial justification makes it a relevant read for those who wish to go beyond legal surface-level analysis.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"J.M. BOSCH EDITOR","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":53407365136731,"sku":"9788412282788","price":35.0,"currency_code":"EUR","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1018\/0650\/6331\/files\/978841228278.jpg?v=1781853222","url":"https:\/\/kalamobooks.com\/en\/products\/9788412282788","provider":"Kalamo Books","version":"1.0","type":"link"}